Notes from Startup Success 2006 with Guy Kawasaki

About This Blog

This site is for  entrepreneurs.  A full RSS feed to the articles is available.  Please subscribe so we know you're out there.  If you need more convincing, learn more about the site.

Community

Google+

And, you can find me on Google+

Connect on Twitter

Get Articles By Email

Your email:

Google

Blog Navigator

Navigate By : 
[Article Index]

Questions about startups?

If you have questions about startups, you can find me and a bunch of other startup fanatics on the free Q&A website:

Answers.OnStartups.com

Subscribe to Updates

 

30,000+ subscribers can't all be wrong.  Subscribe to the OnStartups.com RSS feed.

Follow me on LinkedIn

OnStartups

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Notes from Startup Success 2006 with Guy Kawasaki

 


I listened to a video segment for the Churchill Club’s “Startup 2006” event moderated by Guy Kawasaki and featuring a panel of entrepreneurs including Reid Hoffman, the CEO of LinkedIn and Joe Kraus, the CEO of JotSpot.  

The video is here for those that want to spend the 90 minutes watching it:

http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2006/08/startup_success.html

For those that don’t have the time, I thought I’d share a few excerpts that stuck with me (I watched the whole thing).   Some of the thoughts included are my own, but the original concepts were sparked by one of the panelists.
  1. Distribution, Distribution, Distribution

In retail, the formula for success has been “location, location, location”.  For startups, it is “distribution, distribution, distribution”.  One of the key determinants of success for a startup is how it will distribute the product and get customers.  The risk of not being able to distribute in most cases is higher than the risk of not being able to execute and build a product.
  1. Release Early

One of the panelists (I forget who) had a pithy statement about this.  “If you are not embarrassed about your product at the time you launch it, you’ve launched too late”.  I could not agree more.  Too many startup entrepreneurs strive valiantly (and in vain) to create the “perfect” product.  It is usually much more effective to have the courage to put an imperfect product out there and then the conviction to listen to the market and fix it afterwards.  
  1. Be a trendspotter, not a trendsetter

This one was very interesting.  The premise here is that trendsetters take on a lot of risk because they have to try and predict how customers will respond to a particular offering.  When attempting to set a trend, you are creating something “new” with the expectation that there will be a very positive response.  On the other hand, trendspotting is the process of seeking existing patterns in existing market behavior – and responding to it.  It’s usually much easier to find patterns in existing behavior (and exploit them) than try to create new trends and predict new behavior.
  1. VCs Can Diversify Their Risk Across A Portfolio

This is a relatively obvious one, but still important to be reminded of.  VCs are in the business of seeking high returns on a limited number of their investments.  As such, they are not looking for “modest” outcomes in any individual case.  For their portfolio math to work, they need each of their investments to be striving for a spectacular outcome (with the expectation that most won’t).  On the other hand, entrepreneurs do not have the luxury of a portfolio of investments that they can spread their risk across.  As such, it’s often an all or nothing deal for them.  This can create an understandable tension between VC and entrepreneur.
  1. Face Reality, But Remain Optimistic

Joe Kraus cited the Stockdale Paradox.  The idea is that to succeed, entrepreneurs need to be able to face the harsh reality of their day-to-day existence.  However, simultaneously, they have to remain optimistic that their eventual outcome will be positive.
  1. When Hiring, Allow No False Positives

Once again from Joe Kraus:  When hiring, it is much better to turn down lots of people, even at the risk of losing an opportunity to hire someone that would likely have worked out.  If you’re not 100% sure, no hire.  Take the risk of losing some that may have been great people, if it means you reduce the risk of letting in less than the best.
  1. 60 Hour Weeks Isn’t Enough

This came in response to an audience question about the panelist’s take on work-life-balance and the 40 hour work-week.  The questioner was positing that when he interviewed with startups, he asked the question as to whether or not he was likely to succeed at the company if he worked only 40 hour work weeks.  The response from Reid was interesting (and something I passionately agree with).  You need to understand that in the early days of a startup, you’re the walking dead.  It is up to you and the team to get the company off the ground.  The experience is more of a marathon than a spring.  This means you likely shouldn’t be working 100 hour weeks as you’ll burn yourself out too early.  But, if you’re working only 60 hour weeks, you’re likely not working enough.  This brings to mind one of my 17 pithy insights for startup founders – “Startup founders work long hours for a reason.  There’s more work than there are people.  If you’re seeking balance, seek it elsewhere.”

For others that watched the video (or were actually at the event), feel free to leave your comments of other aspects of the session that you found useful or interesting.  There was a lot of good material covered and I have not come close to capturing it all.
 
 
 

Posted by Dharmesh Shah on Fri, Aug 25, 2006

COMMENTS

Just a quick correction in the statement, "On the other hand, trendsetting is the process of seeking existing patterns". It should be, of course, trendSPOTTING.

posted on Saturday, August 26, 2006 at 12:13 AM by Derek I


Derek: That's what happens when I write an article at midnight on a Friday. Thanks for catching this. It's now fixed.

posted on Saturday, August 26, 2006 at 12:15 AM by


[Quote]When Hiring, Allow No False Positives[/quote]

As well, when things went wrong, project did not went as smoothly. Cut the team into half, and see how it goes

posted on Saturday, August 26, 2006 at 5:53 AM by Andy Rutledge


4. VCs Can Diversity Their Risk Across A Portfolio
Should be :
4. VCs Can Diversify Their Risk Across A Portfolio

Also, did you happen to find anywhere that last point that Joe Craus was trying to make about a companies worth and selling?

Something like:
There's a large amount of buyers for a company selling from 0-50million, and a fewer buyers from 50-250million. But if you take in VC money, you have to make ....... video cut off.

posted on Saturday, August 26, 2006 at 10:27 AM by Robert


Robert: Thanks for catching the error -- fixed.

And no, I have not yet found the closing statement from Joe Kraus. If anyone readings this knows the end of that message, please share it.

posted on Saturday, August 26, 2006 at 12:21 PM by


I was at the event. No offence meant to the other panelists & moderator, but Reid and Joe consistently offered meaningful and clear insights that were superior to everyone else on the panel. They were head and shoulders above everyone else in terms of the value they were willing to share. They were also very clear in citing examples, including mistakes, to back up their statements.

The guy from Photobucket made some good points, and by his own admission, Photobucket was his first big silicon valley adventure. The Jajah panelist acted like a salesrep most of the time, IMO. The other gentleman was interesting, but very much removed from the web 2.0 whirlwind in his approach (and location -- he's up in Sonoma). He seemed like the odd man out on the panel in some respects.

Reid and Joe were also more than willing to take the time to fully answer questions after the event finished. I personally gained some good insights from just a few minutes of their time. Unfortunately, some of the other "superstars" at the event were less forthcoming.

I flew in for the event and Reid and Joe provided a great return on my investment.

posted on Sunday, August 27, 2006 at 2:58 AM by fewquid


“Startup founders work long hours for a reason. There’s more work than there are people. If you’re seeking balance, seek it elsewhere.”

Startup founders work long hours because they have equity. Trying to convince prospective employees to do the same without equity--or with fake equity in the form of "options"--is duplicitous at best, and evil at worst.

posted on Thursday, August 31, 2006 at 2:33 PM by Dropout


Dropout: Against my better judgement, I'll take the bait.

How are options "fake" equity? They're basically allowing employees to have a portion of the value they help crreate.

posted on Thursday, August 31, 2006 at 11:25 PM by


Fewquid,

I find that most of the so-called business gurus have about a dozen points that they find hundreds of ways to recycle ad nauseam. Some even turn them into books. Their books tend to spout the same platitudes over and over. I used to be a voracious reader of business books and blogs until about a year ago. Then it really hit: there is only so much that you can say about business and then the only left is the recycling.

The business guru with anything new to say is truly rare.

posted on Saturday, September 09, 2006 at 8:21 PM by Beef Jezos


Comments have been closed for this article.