COMMENTS
Hey Dharmesh, thanks for the info here. Do you have a link to one a report by one of the big law firms, or just to a page where they publish them?
Good advice. FYI - Barry Kramer and Michael Patrick at Fenwick publish a quarterly report that sets forth "market" terms in the Silicon Valley. The last one I am aware of is for Q309. http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=11
I like the suggestions, thank you!! I have a business that I am currently seeking funding for, do you have any suggestions as to where the best place is to find $$$'s?
I just wish to know, what is the % age of your company you shared with your VC, Did the % age remain same on all rounds of funding (or) it may increase, Generally the hands of Vc's stays higher if a company gets funded - so i also wish to know the % age negotiation between you and your VC.
Regards,
Fundingcart.com
Dharmesh,
I need to raise venture capital but I'm not well connected. How do I go about getting introduced to VC's so I'm not just throwing my business plan on their doorstep?
Are you a VC now ? I'll be using your notes for any negotiation, with anybody, about anything, thanks Shane
Dharmesh,
Nicely consolidated post! Congratulations on your successful raise!
Just a few questions (for an Internet/Web based business):
1. Typically what is the market size (in which the company plans/is already operating) that often a VC looks at?
2. What's "in the market" Term Sheet for a Startup currently?
Thanks
Harsh
Great post!! Nine excellent points. I wouldn't call out a single one over the others.
Dharmesh,
As a former VC who was interested in both your A and B rounds but who was not able to squirm my way in, I think you are forgetting a couple of things that made the Hubspot fund raising process so successful.
1) You and Brian were great founders who had done very impressive things before. VCs love previously successful execs, and you guys had this in spades. If you try to be too modest here you are going to mislead other startup founders. You need to be upfront and make it clear that you were known entities with awesome track records.
2) You had really begun to prove your customer acquisition process. You knew where you were getting leads, how much it cost per lead and what your close rates were. You were also doing this in a way that clearly scaled. VCs could easily see the company growing from this. Companies that do not have this "proof" find it much harder to raise capital. Hubspot was not just a technology idea, or just a developed technology - it was a functioning marketing and sales machine.
Healy Jones
Dharmesh,
I believe the spreadsheet you mention for tracking share of the company and dilution through rounds is called a capitalization table in VC-land.
We have a
customizable capitalization model that yields an Excel template. You can customize it by filling in a simple web form. Take a look at <a>http://www.modelsheetsoft.com/capitalization-table-templates.aspx.
If this "cap table" does not have features you think are important, please tell me about them.
Thanks Dharmesh for the insights! Very helpful.
Healy, by "successful exec" do you mean "successful founders" or would that also include "successful employees"?
Dharmesh - This is an outstanding post, with great practical tips. Indeed, as a corporate lawyer for 15+ years, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of diligencing the guys on the other side of the table - both the firm and the partners (as you discuss in tip #8). Indeed, I discuss this issue in detail in tip #1 of my post here: http://bit.ly/5Gccio. Needless to say, your tip re retaining experienced legal counsel is spot-on as well.
Cheers,
Scott (@ScottEdWalker)
a best one to read - good job...
Dharmesh - useful insights. As you point out, finding/selecting the right investment partner for the long-haul is the objective.
On the flip-side, there are many things that can happen along the way, which can stress or impact the relationship and confidence between the parties.
Further, do like your real-world, perspective on valued employees and co-founders (or other significant connections) - they predictably will change, as the business goes thru different phases and cycles.
Some can be harsh and not endure, although that is less painful than a key investor pulling the plug.
Will look forward to your continued material and webinars on this key subject for aspiring companies.
Edmond Hawkeye Hennessy
CEO
Performance Marketing Group
Author: Market Warfare: Leadership & Domination Over Competitors
A breakthrough book endorsed by Jay Conrad Levinson - the Father of Guerrilla Marketing
We are ramping up as we speak to go out for more money. Every point you raised rings true. The one that strikes me the most is: Beware deal fatigue.
You can also get Fund Raising Fatigue, which can crater your perspective on what a good deal looks like. Knowing the market is important for that but also not taking rejection personally helps get past the "venture speak for no" excuses.
One other thing that I have found is that you have to have a balanced story that focuses on all aspects of the business -- not just the technology. Scale and exit are also important.
Awesome post, Dharmesh. I really like the points you make on 'orchestration' and getting multiple, competing investors interested when negotiating valuation and the rest of the terms. I wrote a blog post on the topic of startup valuation (see it here: bit.ly/5w3m1Z) and the long-winded explanation basically boils down to: i) valuation (and other terms) are set by the market; and, ii) your best way to influence the market is to get some heat (aka competition) going for your deal.
Another tip I might add to your list: in addition to lining up a good attorney who is familiar with "market terms", try to get your due diligence package organized before launching your fundraising roadshow...things like cap table, employee agreements, IP, customer and personal references, etc.
It can be hard to scramble to put it all together at the 11th hour, and you don't want anything slowing down the deal or causing you to lose momentum.
Thanks for the excellent content! Nathan Beckord
www.venturearchetypes.com
Most entrepreneurs have little to no funding experience. Healy brings up Dharmesh's past successes – Dharmesh is working in a known environment where as most entrepreneurs are not. There is no discussion about what is required prior to seeking VC funding, like angel investment or personal money invested prior to the Series A Round? Entrepreneurs need to understand the “crawl, walk, run” levels of funding.
Crawl – Company has a plan and has launched the business (self-funded, CC’s, Family/Friends money) usually over the course of 12-24 months.
Walk – Proven concept and paid back some or all of their debt and have an actual working business model. May occur within the first 12-24 months but usually won’t impress many VC’s if it isn’t north of a million in revenues.
Run – Can demonstrate to investors how their model will scale, is sustainable and ramp up quickly with the “fuel” (money) they provide.
It would help to have information regarding what was originally presented to VC's, i.e. was hubspot profitable, did Hubspot have a patented technology, was there a management team in place, how much of their own money was invested, etc.
Hubspots current numbers indicate $6-18 million in revenues... where were they when they received their first round of funding?
Using my own company as an example:
We are pre-launch, self funded and profitable with enormous scalability.
We have a patented web-based application, beta tested with a fortune 100 customer.
$350,000 in pre-sales booked for 2010 and a multi-year agreement to use our services.
A supply chain and distribution channel established for US, Canada, Mexico and Puerto Rico.
And with all of these achievements the only thing I can see “to-do” here is hire a lawyer… but I am not even sure we are a candidate for a VC firm… probably more of an angel investor… which gets me back to my original point… 95% (my number) of entrepreneurs need a “You Are Here” map to get started in the funding environment.
Shark Tank on ABC is a good example of an angel investment that most every entrepreneur will have to go through before they approach a VC firm. So my thinking is all of these quick tips probably should be applied to angel investing. Once you have a good angel investor finding a VC firm with their help should be much easier.
This is a fantastic post Dharmesh. We are in the middle of fundraising now and this is very timely and sage advice. We've heeded advice from others about hiring a great attorney and I think we did--we choke at the bills, but it's been well worth it. Thanks!
Great informative post as usual Dharmesh
This is great advice for someone like me who is looking for VC in a third world country (Indonesia). We are a niche company specializing in assisting exporters to the United States. My question is - should be diversify in order to improve our viability - we have many, many excellent local contacts.
This is very sound advice. One more item worth adding is that you don't have to go through this arduous and time-consuming journey alone - or with the cold comfort of a lawyer as your only companion. Does that sound like fun or what? There are corporate finance advisers (like Evergreen Equity in Sydney) who can work with you to sharpen your pitch, introduce you to potential funders (a warm call is always better than a cold call) and support you through the negotiation and documentation phases. Well worth considering.
A very helpful resource to add:
The Handbook of Financing Growth, by
Kenneth H. Marks. He is also a the Founder & Managing Partner of High Rock Partners, Inc., an (Investment Banking industry). The Handbook would be an invaluable wealth of information to help business leaders and advisers in this field gain a firm solid understanding of the financing strategies.
A lot of current business owners and managers, found that many of their capital plans fell apart because of a lack of professional business development advice available and the shortage of advice on how to access external investors.
The Handbook also outlines the full spectrum of funding alternatives currently available to emerging growth and middle-market companies and presents the practical strategies and techniques you need to be aware of when considering the capitalization, and growth or sale of your, or your client’s, company.
Great post, unfortunately, few entrepreneurs have the luxury of competing investors in this environment. I find myself advising people to take your funding where you can find it.
With respect to what is market, there are some interesting variances between the east coast and the west coast. One commentator mentioned Fenwick's publication, which covers deals done in the valley. Our publicaton, EEC Perspectives, provides similar data concering terms, valuations, numbers of deals etc. in the New England area. Q4 and year end data should be published this later this week. I understand it is bad form to plug your own stuff on other people's blogs, so I wont say more, but if you search you should find.
With respect to legal fees, the bad news is that they are high, but the good news is that lawyers are not immune to the general economic environment and we want new promising clients. Don't be too shy about having a serious conversation about cost (before your lawyer starts chalking up the hours) with your lawyer. If there is a good chance for a long term profitable relationship, he or she may surprise you.
Very good advice... I'd also add that it must be something you are completely passionate about. Raising money from outside sources when you don't have interest in your business is a quick deal killer.
Jon @ WoodMarvels.com
I find this post fairly naive Dharmesh. You raised this money because you have a successful track record. Full Stop.
The rest is just BS so you can feel good about yourself and peddle "advice". I am always perplexed why so many people like to pretend otherwise.
Pardon my newb comments here, but is venture capital something for new and unique companies or products? What about raising money for something that I know works, but need to expand upon? Could I get venture capital for that, or should I just stick to a business loan?
Good post with lost of useful tips. I think the commenter above who mentioned that knowing where you are (bootstrap vs. pre-rev vs. revenue vs. expansion capital) is right on. It will ensure you're getting 'funding fatigue' with people who can execute against a deal if they do so choose, and you're not chasing capital guys that don't play in your field, and at your funding level.
This also means that as you bootstrap more and grow revenues, you theoretically may need less capital from external sources. This takes you out of play from some of the big names who do $5-$10mm minimums. Do your research and you'll find those who fall in your sweet spot.
The second point is that I believe a good law firm is worth the fees. I know that our attorney has played a key role in helping me understand the current angel and VC landscape, and how to position deals accordingly. If you have a strong idea/prototype, a law firm may extend you credit terms enough to cover your initial set up and round. They're betting that your idea is solid enough to get funding so they get paid back. Also, it encourages them to make intros for you. Finally, from day 1, they can help you structure your company in a way that the smart money likes to see. Down the road, you avoid having to go back and fix things - which is neither pleasant or inexpensive.
Hey all!
->> @Healy Jones
You solved the case. People here should read his comment.
Dharmesh,
I understand you are not God :-), but you have an impressive background and that is half way to success.
Another great post.
Thanks everyone for your comments, and I would like to make one point clear:
Raising VC is *not* by any means easy, and I don't want to mislead anyone. I've been vocal on this blog and in my public speaking sessions that the odds of raising money from venture capitalists is actually very, very low.
HubSpot was a special case. I'll write about this in a future article, but the summary is that we had a bunch of things stacked in our favor so we weren't the "typical" case (by far).
Startups are an important sector in the investors industry and we must all support them. Check out startup reviews on http://www.vcgate.com/2009/09/28/adimos-takes-the-wiring-out-of-your-home-entertainment-system/
Startups are an important sector in the investors industry and we must all support them. Check out startup reviews on http://www.vcgate.com/2009/09/28/adimos-takes-the-wiring-out-of-your-home-entertainment-system/
Sou do brasil e quero muito poder trocar experiências com você que possue total sapiens sobre o capital de risco. investidores aplicam em paises emergentes e esse é o nosso caso, pois temos um projeto audacioso voltado para uma empresa que constroi casas e prédios no estilo light steel framing e estamos atrás de recursos financeiros para podermos montar a nossa indústria de casas e prédios nessa modalidade, light steel framing aqui na região amazônica do Brasil.
Saudações cristãs,
LUIZ SUZANO
CIS - LTDA.
Dharmesh - I need a full proof NDA to present to a few VC meetings I have coming up. Something that covers patent laws possibly with a severe penalty. Actually, can you send me a NDA that you have or where I can obtain a rock solid NDA? I have seen a few already and I am not impressed. Great Article by the way.
Dharmesh.
Loved your 9 tips and decided to re-assess them relative to the area we work with. Companies raising capital PRIOR to Venture Capitalists.
I've reworded some of the sections but found most applied and the structure worked.
The 9 tips for "pre-venture capital" can be found here ...
ASSOB - Capital Underdogs