3 Things LinkedIn Can Learn From Digg To Compete With Facebook

About This Blog

This site is for  entrepreneurs.  A full RSS feed to the articles is available.  Please subscribe so we know you're out there.  If you need more convincing, learn more about the site.



And, you can find me on Google+

Connect on Twitter

Get Articles By Email

Your email:


Blog Navigator

Navigate By : 
[Article Index]

Questions about startups?

If you have questions about startups, you can find me and a bunch of other startup fanatics on the free Q&A website:


Subscribe to Updates


30,000+ subscribers can't all be wrong.  Subscribe to the OnStartups.com RSS feed.

Follow me on LinkedIn


Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

3 Things LinkedIn Can Learn From Digg To Compete With Facebook


I came across an interesting article today on CNNMoney.com titled "LinkedIn Says It Will Own Business Networking".

Basically, Dan Nye, the CEO of LinkedIn is saying that people will build one online profile of their personal life and one for their professional life.  He could be right.  He's probably smarter than I am (and Reid Hoffman, the founder, is definitely smarter than I am).  But, I don't think it's necessary to concede this ground just yet.  Often, the best defense ("we want to keep our professional customers" is a great offense.

I were chairman of the board, master of the universe and grand poo-bah at LinkedIn, here's what I'd do:

1.  Create A Simple API:  I cannot tell you how surprised I am that LinkedIn has not done this yet.  It is a perfect platform to allow others to extend and create value for.  The data model is relatively simple and the user-base is large and growing.  If they need an example of a simple, well implemented API, they should just look at the new digg API

2.  Get Better At Groups:  At the request of several members of the OnStartups community, I created the OnStartups LinkedIn group.  First off, it was a pain in the neck to actually get this done (there's no automated way to do it).  It took multiple attempts and several months.  After all was said and done, I've got the group setup and it's grown (over 800 members now).  But, it doesn't really do anything other than list people in the group. There are no social networking or group features like one would expect.  Digg is not the perfect example here, but it's a start.

3.  Get On Board With RSS:  I'm an RSS fiend.  I don't read emails anymore (especially not automated ones that update me regularly on things).  That's why god created RSS, so my inbox can be clogged with a combination of SPAM and real emails of carbon-based life forms.  LinkedIn should have at least one master RSS feed that told me when new people came into my network, when others have accessed my profile, when folks have joined my group, etc.  It's not that hard to do.  Digg supports RSS in a whole bunch of places -- and especially where it counts.

That's it.  These three things alone might not win them the battle -- but it sure would help.  If nothing else, they'd have at least one (paying) customer that was happy.  What do you think?  Any more ideas of how LinkedIn could improve it's service and fend off the powerhouse that is Facebook?  Also, If you're in an early-stage startup and building out a community or platform at least two of the above items are probably good advice.

Posted by Dharmesh Shah on Tue, Jun 12, 2007


I do not think making a simple API will make it grow. There must be numbers of APIs to make it worth looking. e.g. WHO INVITED ME API HOT MEMBERS API MY INBOX API MY FRIENDS ACTIVITIES API

posted on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 at 1:45 PM by Raman Basu

One key feature is internationalization.
I want to read it in spanish, chinesse, french and german... before they have to buy hundreds of local LinkedIn-like companies.

posted on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 at 8:05 PM by leovernazza

I added my two cents to the whole argument last week: http://jayfallon.net/?p=20 and then followed up with commentary on the Xing/Zoominfo partnership. All in all I agree with you Dharmesh in that LinkedIn is going to be more than just a contact list to maintain a large market share.

posted on Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at 1:19 PM by Jay Fallon

I agree the process of setting groups up is not easy. It has however improved vastly in last 2 years but an automated process will be the most effective way to do it. LI has in beta at present a feature 'who looked at my profile'. However what it does not have yet is a tagging feature. So for instance, I look at the profile of person X. I have no use for contacting him now but would like to do so in 3-4 months' time. In the absence of a tagging feature and/ or a calendaring utility built into LI, this means the task goes into my to-do lists elsewhere. Needless to say too much fragmentation. Do they take feedback? Should the grand poo-bah not be available to take this feedback? Thanks.

posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 at 4:39 AM by Shefaly

Comments have been closed for this article.