Understanding Real Network Effects

About This Blog

This site is for  entrepreneurs.  A full RSS feed to the articles is available.  Please subscribe so we know you're out there.  If you need more convincing, learn more about the site.



And, you can find me on Google+

Connect on Twitter

Get Articles By Email

Your email:


Blog Navigator

Navigate By : 
[Article Index]

Questions about startups?

If you have questions about startups, you can find me and a bunch of other startup fanatics on the free Q&A website:


Subscribe to Updates


30,000+ subscribers can't all be wrong.  Subscribe to the OnStartups.com RSS feed.

Follow me on LinkedIn


Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Understanding Real Network Effects


I hear the term “network effects” a fair number of times when I talk to software company founders.  The thinking goes something like this:  “We’re going to give away our AJAX-driven, patent-pending, orphan sock matching software away for free so we can build a large base of customers and take advantage of network effects."


In my experience, In about 1 out of 4 times the term “network effect” is used, it is used incorrectly.  People often mistake having a large customer-base with an automatic network effect.


I’m by no means an expert on network effects and couldn’t give you a rock-solid, academically oriented definition, but I can provide a simple explanation:  A network effect exists when each user/customer/member that is added to the network increases the “value” of the network to other users.  So, if you have 10,000 customers, you don’t necessarily have a business model with a “network effect” unless customer X benefits from the fact that customer Y is also on the network.  Though a (weak) argument can be made that customer X indirectly benefits customer Y, because they’re paying money, thereby increasing your revenues, thereby giving you more resources to improve the product – this is really not what network effects are about.


Social sites like Linked In, delicious, and others have a network effect.  The more users there are, the more everybody benefits.  If I’m a user, there is some benefit (sometimes miniscule) to me if you also join the network.  The power of this model is that when users understand this, they are more likely to refer other users (because they would benefit from the growth in the network).  Other examples are the phone system (the more people that have phones, the more people that you can potentially talk to), instant messaging, Skype and others.


A good example of the absence of network effects is the Google search engine.  I’m going to argue that just because I’m using the Google search engine does not directly increase the value of the engine to you.  I could stop using Google tomorrow, and it would still work for you just as well.  In fact, in a theoretical sense, you could be the only user to use the Google search engine, and as long as the algorithm still worked and the index was still there, you’d get about the same value.  It helps you find stuff.  In fact, you have little incentive to convince me to use Google as well (other than good will) because it does not increase your Google experience at all.


So, next time someone tells you their business takes advantage of “network effects”, ask them how you would benefit from the system by getting other people to join.  If there’s not a good answer, or the benefit is indirect, chances are, there’s no network effect.





Posted by on Fri, Mar 03, 2006


although google may not fit your definition of having a network effect model, google can be seen as a 'reporter' of network effect.

its search technology, which i know very little about, uses network effect to 'report' on top websites with the content that you are searching for. by using the words people use to link to other websites and capturing which site link to others, it is capturing the network effect and letting you reap the benefits of it.

posted on Monday, March 06, 2006 at 1:19 PM by

Comments have been closed for this article.