Startups: Competing With Venture Funded Rivals

About This Blog

This site is for  entrepreneurs.  A full RSS feed to the articles is available.  Please subscribe so we know you're out there.  If you need more convincing, learn more about the site.



And, you can find me on Google+

Connect on Twitter

Get Articles By Email

Your email:


Blog Navigator

Navigate By : 
[Article Index]

Questions about startups?

If you have questions about startups, you can find me and a bunch of other startup fanatics on the free Q&A website:

Subscribe to Updates


30,000+ subscribers can't all be wrong.  Subscribe to the RSS feed.

Follow me on LinkedIn


Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Startups: Competing With Venture Funded Rivals


All of my prior startup experience has been with bootstrapped startups (i.e. no VC funding).  As such, I’ve had to deal the situation where I found myself competing with rivals that were much better funded.  For purposes of this article, I’m going to assume that the competition is another startup (and not a large company with much better funding).  The dynamics of competing with a large company are different and I’ll save that topic for another day.  

There is no pat answer to responding to this situation (if there were a standard answer for anything, it probably wouldn’t be interesting enough to write about anyways).  But, I do have some thoughts on the topic based on some of my own experience – both within my own startups and those that I’ve been involved in.

For example, my first startup, Pyramid Digital Solutions was in a small enough niche that it had little competition in its early years.  But, later, in 1996 we broadened our product offering and pursued a larger market (creating specialized web applications for our vertical within the financial services industry).  Eventually, we found ourselves competing with three other startups that each raised over $25 million in VC funding.  Even for that time, $25 million was a fair amount of money.  One of these startups was a direct competitor and the other two were indirect competitors.  As you might imagine, this had us a bit worried.  We were selling to large financial institutions and were constantly dealing with the issue of a weak balance sheet.  When we were enjoying a competition-free existence, this wasn’t a big problem (the number of alternatives was minimal, and we were clearly the best choice).  With VC-funded competitors, this changed.  Customers are rightfully comforted when dealing with startups that have venture investors.  It removes a lot of the risk from the equation that the startup will die in the near-term.  A lot of the sales we lost were not because we had an inferior product (we didn’t), but because we were a risky bet.

I’ll tell you how all this turned out for me at the end of this article.

Competing With Venture Funded Rivals
  1. Resist getting distracted:  When you first learn that one of your competitors has raised VC funding, it’ll be hard to ignore.  And, you shouldn’t ignore it.  But, you shouldn’t let it distract you too the point of inaction.  It’s important remember that just because they have fresh cash in the bank doesn’t mean that they’re going to be able to do something with it immediately.  But, you shouldn’t dismiss this event.  When a rival raises money, it’s a big deal. 

  1. Talk to your team:  One of the biggest challenges this kind of news has is the potential effect on your team – particularly your management team.  Though it’s possible that the competitor will use some of their new cash to try and lure members of your team away – this is not as likely as you might think.  The bigger issue is that your team may lose faith in your ability to compete in the face of well-funded competition.  Negative morale can become a serious issue.  I would advise having a discussion with key members of your team and keeping them aware of what’s going on.  

  1. Their incentives are impacted:  If a startup raises VC funding (particularly when it’s a large amount), the management team’s equity interest dilutes.  In the short-run, this will have little impact (because the team is still basking in the glow of the new cash).  But, as time progresses, you will find that it may get harder and harder for the team to be motivated as the chances of them making any real money have gone down.  For example, by raising $25 million, our competitors basically raised the bar for what type of valuation they would need to exit with in order to see significant cash at the time of a liquidity event (acquisition or IPO).  Based on the terms of the VC deal, they may have needed to exit with valuations exceeding $50 million for it to deliver significant cash to the founders or management team.  Once the going gets tough (and it usually always does), the team will figure out that the likelihood of a big exit is low.  This shifts their incentives. It’s important to keep this in mind.  This is one of the best things about a bootstrapped approach.  Even if you make a modest exit, you still make a fair amount of money.  This keeps the founders motivated the whole way through.

  1. Don’t compete on price:  One of the things your better funded rivals will likely do (very quickly) is focus on building market share at the cost of revenues and profits.  This manifests itself in two forms:  a decrease in price or a an increase in what is provided.  For example, if you’re selling into the enterprise market, your competitor may give away free services, customizations or implementation projects.  These can be expensive, but they can afford it.  It’s generally a bad idea to try and match their price and/or terms.  You won’t be able to outspend them (without raising capital yourself).  You need to find a different strategy.

  1. Determine market validation:  One potential piece of good news when a competitor raises funding is that it may be a sign of validation for your market.  VCs are generally very smart people and would normally not invest large sums of money unless they saw at least the potential for a large market opportunity.   This could be good news for you (particularly if you’re looking to raise funding too).  

  1. Check out the investors:  It is always a good idea to learn as much as you can about the investors that funded your competitor.  What other companies are in their portfolio?  Who’s the partner that is sitting on the board?  What is her background?  One of the biggest impacts a VC can have on a startup (outside of the cash) is the network and contacts that they bring to the table.  If the VC is well connected within your industry, you may see your rival closing some deals that you’ve had a hard time getting done.

  1. Be cautious of partnerships:  It’s possible that you’ll consider forging partnerships as a way to respond to the new market threat.  In fact, you may even enter discussions of partnering up with one of your rivals that just received funding.  Though you should always look objectively at such opportunities and judge their potential value to you, I will share one thought.  In my 12+ years of experience in startup-land, I have found that crafting a partnership that actually delivers value is very, very difficult.  Usually they end up being grossly asymmetric (one party needs/wants the partnership much more than the other) and as a result ends up not creating the outcome that was originally planned.  Not sure why that is, but it’s just been my experience.  Your mileage will vary.

This is obviously a difficult and complex topic (so it’s hard to provide any real definitive tips or guidelines).  Hope the above has helped.

As for my own story, I am pleased to announce that it had a happy ending (for us, not our competitors).  One startup shut-down completely.  One of the others scaled back considerably and ultimately shifted back into a consulting company.  The final one was put up for sale by the VCs that funded it.  I ended up being the winning bidder and acquiring the technology assets as part of the auction (and ended up paying considerably less than the capital they had spent to build their product).  Net result:  We essentially won that battle.  Not due to brilliant strategy or execution on my part, but I’ll take the win anyways.  I’d rather be naïve and win, than brilliant and lose (most of the time).
Moral of the story:  Just because you’re running a bootstrapped startup doesn’t mean that you can’t compete effectively with better funded rivals.  The key is to think through the implications and not get too distracted.  Chances are, even a smart competitor won’t use the cash as wisely as you fear.  Your goal is to survive the short-term because life usually gets harder for them in the long-term.  

Posted by Dharmesh Shah on Tue, Oct 10, 2006


Hi Dharmesh,
I find point 4 the most valuable, and I agree with you on point 7. We explored the possibility of partnership with some established firms in our market, but we had different expectations and different views on who needed the other more.
Before getting to the outcome of your own story, I was thinking that we should raise some VC before other players enter the market and raise funds, but afterwards it would seem that it's wiser to remain bootstrapped.
If you had raised some VC before the others entered your market, you would had both experience and funding on your side. But would that mean a better outcome for you and your company?
Raising VC looks like the best approach to survive in a highly globalized market, where you will surely have to face both startups and big companies, in the international market and the smaller local ones.
At least I think it is for European companies, as the European market is very fragmented when you compare it to the US one. This means that EU companies must have the global market on their minds from the start, and that means a greater need for funding.

posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 11:12 AM by Narciso Cerezo

Great post. Thanks for this perspective. It's something that's been on our minds lately with all these crazy fundings and buyouts.

posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 11:15 AM by Justin

In 1998-99 I was leading an online-filfillment service for gift certificates for large shopping centers and downtowns. Because we were located in Michigan we never got VC funnding while our competitors in CA and NY took in over $10 million each. We stayed ahead of them all the way to the bubble burst by understanding how people used gift certificates especially in corporate gifting.


posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 11:53 AM by Stiennon

Useful line of thought, "boot strap companies can successfully compete with VC funded competitors".

You address each of the points in general terms and they are valid. Your audience might also enjoy reading a bit more about the detailed steps you took in order to successfully compete with the VC funded competitors. Therein you might consider including in candid open terms as to whether or not the dot-bomb played any significant part toward the survival and success of your firm.

posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 12:36 PM by Sheamus

I've been reading your blog for some months now. Thanks for the insights.

As I read this entry, I found myself thinking that your bullet points about evaluating your startup competitor is extensible to more than just strategic analysis. Potential employees of startups can also use this list to perform some serious due diligence before they decide to join a startup.

I was recently thinking about this topic as I was changing companies recently. I've captured my thoughts here so other startup-y people can learn from my own mistakes:

posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 1:04 PM by huned

Thanks to everyone for your comments. I agree that I did "hedge" a bit with this article and didn't dig into the details. The reason for doing this is that some of this stuff is very case-specific.

But, I'll take a bit more risk with a follow-up article and describe why I think VC funded companies today are not entirely different from VC funded companies from the bubble.

Should make for interesting debate.

posted on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 5:20 PM by

There's a whole batch of problems that comes with being funded by a VC firm. The money comes with a lot of strings attached. I wrote this piece back around 98 or 99, but it still stands--except for the reference to the 28 year old VCs. I haven't seen many of those since all the dotcoms turned into smoking craters in 2000.

posted on Wednesday, October 11, 2006 at 4:13 PM by Peter

This is an excellent insight. Thanks for the great learning. Mainly this post talks about what you should NOT do. It will be interesting to know "What you should do?"

In your case, even though you won at the end, I dont think it was purely luck. Definitely you can not win by sitting idle. I guess you must have executed some aggressive strategies or so.

I think that should be next topic of your blog - how to try to win VC funded rival competition!

Gr8 post anyways.

posted on Friday, October 13, 2006 at 10:42 PM by Aditya Kothadiya

Comments have been closed for this article.