Random Voices: The Power Of Influence In The Blogosphere

About This Blog

This site is for  entrepreneurs.  A full RSS feed to the articles is available.  Please subscribe so we know you're out there.  If you need more convincing, learn more about the site.



And, you can find me on Google+

Connect on Twitter

Get Articles By Email

Your email:


Blog Navigator

Navigate By : 
[Article Index]

Questions about startups?

If you have questions about startups, you can find me and a bunch of other startup fanatics on the free Q&A website:


Subscribe to Updates


30,000+ subscribers can't all be wrong.  Subscribe to the OnStartups.com RSS feed.

Follow me on LinkedIn


Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Random Voices: The Power Of Influence In The Blogosphere


I came across this article on one of the blogs I read regularly:  Everyone Is An Influencer

In the article, Cameron Olthuis posits that it is important for companies not just to focus their efforts on the “influencers” (in the classic marketing sense), but everyone.  The rationale is that just about everyone might be an influencer these days on the blogosphere and you shouldn’t limit your efforts just to those that you think or suspect are influencers.

I agree with most of what Cameron has to say (and the article is a nice easy read).  But I have one point I’d like to push back on.

I disagree with his statement that “all one needs to do is shout through the megaphone and people will hear it, loud and clear.”  Though we are a much more connected society now and it does not take being a media magnate or having an existing readership in the millions to wield influence anymore, it’s not as straight-forward as Cameron is suggesting.  The challenge now is not that megaphones are expensive, and so few people can afford them, but the fact that since they are so cheap, lots of people have them.  The result is a cacophony of messages out there making it harder and harder to separate signal from noise.  

Of course, just because there’s a low probability that any individual message will make it through, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t pay attention to the possibility.  You should track your “buzz” and make sure you know what is being said about you and your offering on the web.  You can’t wait until the issue escalates (i.e. a particular message from a particular would-be-influencer rises above the noise).  By that point, it will be too late.

Also, not all businesses are created equal.  Some are more “at risk” of influence by the blogosphere than others.  Many businesses, big and small, now have to deal with the “random voices” factor.  That is, every now and then (and more often than we might suspect), individual voices will randomly strike a chord with the community and rise above the noise.  It is important that we as business leaders recognize this both for the opportunity it represents and the risk that it entails.  

Posted by admin_onstartups.com admin_onstartups.com on Thu, Sep 28, 2006


That is a good point, but like you said that still needs to be watched. Seperating signal from noise is part of the job. Companies can't afford to wait until the problem escalates.

posted on Thursday, September 28, 2006 at 2:38 PM by cameron olthuis

Morning Dharmesh.

Been thinking about your blog since my first visit yesterday. Thus, I gave onstartups and you a mention in my blog this morning, ecouraging people to visit and post a comment.

As an ancient (increasingly fit) guy I like your focus and young entrepreneurs in the software space that can learn something useful.

As a side-note, possibly you could address an issue that has been bothering me for the past several months. For example, Digg or YouTube or other team comes along with an original idea. Next thing you know there are multiple "knock-offs". Is Reddit that much different from Digg? What the heck is going on? Are there significant value-adds applicable to these copycat initiatives?

posted on Friday, September 29, 2006 at 8:13 AM by Sheamus

Comments have been closed for this article.